Linked by weildish on Sat 24th Jan 2009 22:44 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 345507
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-03-17
They have been complacent or patent trolls wouldn't get away with what they are doing.
Even if it is legal (and it is) this does not mean that the patent system is deeply flawed. Patents should cover products and physical implementations and not ideas.
Frankly it is almost as stupid as patenting sections of the human genome (which some pharmaceutical companies have done).
I agree that patents should exist, but not in the current form. A lot of the trouble would be prevented if the patent office wouldn't grant patents so complacently.
Who cares whether you're american or not?
What the hell does prison have to do with patent law?