Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Jan 2009 11:56 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 345536
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-01-26
In this day and age selling an OS without browsing capabilities is like selling a car with no wheels. Anyone wanting to get one would be forced to physically go and get a set of wheels and then install them on their own in order to be able to cruise around.
Forcing Microsoft to include competing browsers in their installation is a better choice but still sounds lame to me. I am not sure what would be the ideal compromise.
Check out My cartoon take of this story: http://www.pcdisorder.com/2009/01/ie-free-windows-dumb.html