Linked by weildish on Sat 24th Jan 2009 22:44 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 345558
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: I guess, at best
by wakeupneo on Mon 26th Jan 2009 16:04
in reply to "RE[3]: I guess, at best"
whats' so nice of them? Khtml was there and could cut down dev time and costs, there is no "niceness" behind their reasons for using it.
'Nice of them' with respect to them knowing that they'd be contributing their own code to the community from the get-go. They could have chosen a proprietary path (Opera's Presto for example) and contributed nothing.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Err...that doesn't sound quite right. Wiki:
KHTML and KJS were adopted by Apple in 2002 for use in the Safari web browser. Apple publishes the source code for their fork of the KHTML engine, called WebKit, as required by the LGPL.
Not quite 'out of the goodness of their hearts' like you make it sound...but still, nice of them to go with KHTML in the first place