Linked by weildish on Sat 24th Jan 2009 22:44 UTC
Legal Several days ago when Apple hinted at legal action against Palm, we held our breath to see just what would happen. Now Palm has stepped up to the plate boldly and hinted that they'd fight whatever legal action is thrown at them.
Thread beginning with comment 345561
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: I guess, at best
by _txf_ on Mon 26th Jan 2009 15:51 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: I guess, at best"
_txf_
Member since:
2008-03-17

whats' so nice of them? Khtml was there and could cut down dev time and costs, there is no "niceness" behind their reasons for using it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: I guess, at best
by wakeupneo on Mon 26th Jan 2009 16:04 in reply to "RE[3]: I guess, at best"
wakeupneo Member since:
2005-07-06

whats' so nice of them? Khtml was there and could cut down dev time and costs, there is no "niceness" behind their reasons for using it.


'Nice of them' with respect to them knowing that they'd be contributing their own code to the community from the get-go. They could have chosen a proprietary path (Opera's Presto for example) and contributed nothing.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: I guess, at best
by _txf_ on Mon 26th Jan 2009 17:46 in reply to "RE[4]: I guess, at best"
_txf_ Member since:
2008-03-17

Nice, like their contribution of the mach kernel. Apple provides sources of their underlying bsd system, but they don't seem to do so happily.

Only recently has webkit been easily accessible (due to complaints). Before people had to jump through hoops in order to contribute to webkit.

There is nothing wrong with using open source to reduce product development time or cost, but don't mistake it for niceness. Apple to me seems even more incompatible with open source than microsoft, with all their innate desire for secrecy despite the fact that they employ open source tech extensively.

Edited 2009-01-26 17:49 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2