Linked by weildish on Sat 24th Jan 2009 22:44 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 345594
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-11-04
Software patents are no different from others. You can be sure that if computers were around during the time our country was formed (and all others as well), patents would have also covered software.
This is rubbish, books were around when the patent system was invented and patents on books were/are not allowed, for good reason, they are protected by copyright, same as software. Somebody who says we should allow patents on software or business concepts should also say we should allow patents on books, storylines, because it's exactly the same thing. Today's world would be a pretty sad place if that would've been allowed to happen.