To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I beg to differ.
Every browser rendering engine does better than 71/100 on Acid3 now (looking at stable releases)
IE gets 21/100.
Acid3 is very important in showing that however many improvements they’ve put in compared to IE 6&7, it still has a long way to go to reach parity.
Yes, Web developers can finally use a fuller range of CSS selectors on sites, and have fewer bugs to contend with. But beyond that, there is nothing* like SVG, Canvas, Video etc.
IE8 is going to hold us back for years.
*Shims exist. They are hacks.
"Acid2 is the important one, 3 really hasnt come into play enough to worry about yet... "
What? If everyone would follow you, the web technologies would not evolve at all. Come on, Acid 2 was passed by all browsers except IE for years, this is a old thing, now for today's web, this is Acid 3 which matters. I mean, Safari passed Acid 2 in 2005 and we are in 2009!!!! Please!!!
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/hyatt/archives/2005_04.html
And once again, IE is far behind regarding Acid 3 as it used to be with Acid 2. Safari 4 (beta) or Opera have been scoring 100 in Acid 3 for months already.
By the way,
IE WebSlices = Apple's WebClip,
Again another idea stolen by Microsoft. Nice done Ballmer..... thank you Microsoft for your incredible sense of creativity.




Member since:
2005-07-13
IE8 was never inteneded to pass the Acid3 but indtead it's focus was on the Acid2 (which it passes). IE8 gets a 20 on the Acid3 (a slight step up frmo the 14 it got with beta 2). Acid2 is the important one, 3 really hasnt come into play enough to worry about yet...
Edited 2009-01-26 23:22 UTC