Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Jan 2009 13:46 UTC
Editorial With Windows 7 having made its grand debut, and with KDE4's vision making leaps and bounds forward with every release, we have two major software projects that have decided to implement some fairly drastic interface changes. Such changes are bound to receive some harsh criticisms - but the funny thing is, these criticisms usually come from people you least expect it from.
Thread beginning with comment 345800
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

at least kde 4.2 allows to completly hide the panel. there , gnome sucks kde rulez. ( being overly exagerated )

And this is where I disagree with the line of the article. See, I can take change, plasmoids are nice and can be useful.

However, when gnome panel wouldn't autohide properly they were taking features away from us.

The start menu cannot be simpler than the original Win95. You could browse it with two clicks. Now apparently we have to click and browse endless menus in order to be a *modern* OS.

In Windows 7, the classic theme is gone forever, now it seems you need 4096x3000 displays in order to fit a widget into your screen. I understand that some people have large screens and enjoy useless eye candy, but to me it is stealing screen real state. The same theme without ludicrously enlarged widgets and taskbar, wouldn't bother me at all.

Did Microsoft have to design the ribbons so that they took up *more* space than the original mess they were meant to replace?

Oh, BTW, and the Oscar goes to, GUI animations. "Yes you have clicked on that menu, but wait because you have to witness it unfold all its 3D beauty until you are allowed to do anything useful". You win extra points if the user cannot disable them or doing so will remove additional features.

All these are changes that remove functionality for the sake of change. Why do we have to put up with that?

Reply Parent Score: 6