Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Jan 2009 16:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 346173
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Why are patients granted?
by waffer on Fri 30th Jan 2009 00:37
in reply to "Why are patients granted?"
Patients are very useful. Imagine you are a drug company and you spend $200 million developing a drug. You put it on the market with no patent and 15 other companies copy your formula. Now you have other people getting rich of off your huge investment and you see no return. Now, you decide not to develop drugs anymore because anyone can just copy your formula. No new drugs are developed ever again.
RE[2]: Why are patients granted?
by capricorn_tm on Fri 30th Jan 2009 18:56
in reply to "RE: Why are patients granted?"
Patients are very useful. Imagine you are a drug company and you spend $200 million developing a drug. You put it on the market with no patent and 15 other companies copy your formula. Now you have other people getting rich of off your huge investment and you see no return. Now, you decide not to develop drugs anymore because anyone can just copy your formula. No new drugs are developed ever again.
Mate, as much I appreciate it that you try to put it that simple for the sake of explaining this complex task, what you said is plainly WRONG.
In Europe we have a system of brevets and nobody can steal your things in any way, patents do not work like that.
Patents do work in the following way, I have an idea, I write it down, I get it patented and from that moment on NOBODY can use it unless paying me royalty.
Mind me, you never did any R&D, you can have a patent simply on the idea, you do not have to have done anything but having the idea and, if you are granted the patent, you will be able to sow the fruit of SOMEONE ELSE doing the R&D for you.
This is what a patent is about and it is THE cart of bullshit.





Member since:
2006-03-23
I cannot understand the purpose of patents. I can understand the idea behind copyright infringement.
Can someone give me an good example in which patents have a good merit?
Because as far I can see, they should never have been granted in the first place. I'm not trying to be ignorant, but I'm having a hard time understanding their use-case.
Thanks,
Mike
Edited 2009-01-30 00:13 UTC