Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Jan 2009 16:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 346350
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Why are patients granted?
by nevali on Sat 31st Jan 2009 22:44
in reply to "RE[4]: Why are patients granted?"
You don't have to build a prototype, but you are supposed to give clear instructions such that "somebody skilled in the art" can build whatever your thing is.
Unfortunately, patent examiners can't exactly be hugely knowledgeable across all of the fields things can be patented in, so what happens is that the whole thing gets dealt with in courts instead.
As a result, what was a relatively fair system when it applied solely to mechanical inventions is now a hugely unfair system tilted in favour of those with the best lawyers.





Member since:
2005-12-31
Because in the patent system it is not necessary to bring a working prototype at all, you just come with an idea.
If tomorrow I patent the idea of a microchip based on neural synaptic connections ( I'ma ST fan) and they grant me the patent, if someone else creates somethig like that he has to pay me royalties.
Mind me, I did not bring a Chip, I just patented the idea that is how patents work.
For a brevet you have to bring a working prototypes and that stops the scamming.