Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 31st Jan 2009 10:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 346398
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Point being what? If they were tricked into clicking through UAC one time, then they will surely do it again, if it means the difference between seeing what they think is a naked photo or not.
I think you're missing the point here. If I understand it correctly, the exploit will be able to turn off UAC without UAC ever prompting the user that it is being turned off. So the user will never get the origial prompt that the program/script they just ran is attempting to do something fishy.




Member since:
2005-11-29
Point being what? If they were tricked into clicking through UAC one time, then they will surely do it again, if it means the difference between seeing what they think is a naked photo or not.
But whatever, it seems common sense is lost on a lot of people who foam at the mouth and jump at the opportunity to criticize.
Edited 2009-01-31 18:15 UTC