Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Feb 2009 21:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 346871
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-06
Which allowed Windows Media Player and all the mp3 player companies that baught into Play For Sure to keep on working perfectly after Microsoft aborted the technology infavor of a new DRM bound to the Zune? You mean like that kind of "if you baught the DRM content, you can play it anywhere" kind of fair use?
Maybe you mean the way hdmi requires DRM'd hardware to get full resolution out of your blueray and hd-dvd media where "uncertified" hardware would play that same content at full resolution if it wasn't artificially limited to lower resolutions.
I'm just trying to get a grasp of how DRM adds benefits and value to the end user.. you know.. the law abiding consumer that is supposed to be the reason the market exists in the first play.