Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Feb 2009 21:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 346958
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
I am going on second-hand info here ... I personally won't touch Vista with a ten foot barge pole.
My post did ask to try it ... I did not say it would or would not work ... it seems very much to depend on the source of the original content.
My second-hand information was: (1) Someone (on an online forum similar to this one) had used Vista to make a fair-use extract from a CD that they legally owned and had sent me that extract ... and I would have required to use Vista and obtain a permission certificate from a Microsoft server in order to play it, and (2) Someone has asked me why they can't use their new Vista laptop to extract tracks from CDs they legally owned in order to play these tracks on their car's .mp3 player system, when they can do exactly that same operation using the same methods on their older XP desktop system.
Obviously, from your anectdote, Vista's Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) is broken, because it doesn't seem to apply the same "end-user restricting rules" consistently all the time.
Finally ... I note you completely ignore the main objection to Vista DRM ... which is about the inherent binding of DRMed content to a particular platform (and hence software provider), that would (if allowed to become prevalent amongst media players) create a monopoly for reproduction of digital media content.
Edited 2009-02-03 22:14 UTC