Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Feb 2009 07:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 347104
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-11
There have only been TWO single core Intel Mac models made, and only one of them, the Core Solo Mac Mini, was ever available for retail sail, and briefly in 2006 at that.
I just don't see what the fuss is about Apple leaving releasing an application that works perfectly on all Macs of at least the last 6 years, and loses one of its features unless you have something more powerful than the absolutely slowest three-year-old model.
The other single core Mac was the developer Intel Mac from 2005 that was never sold at retail.
So other than developers who should have moved to production Macs by now, those who bought the very first and very cheapest Intel Mini 3-years-ago, or of course the many Hackintosh users for whom Apple has no obligation to support in any way, exactly which Intel Mac owners are affected by this?