Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Feb 2009 07:05 UTC
Apple Apple has always been about moving forward, about pressing customers to buy the latest and greatest. Product pacing has been high in Cupertino (except for the Mac Mini, obviously), and this is obviously a good thing if you're an Apple bean counter. Most Apple fans more or less accept this planned obsolescence without question, but the company may have just gone a little too far.
Thread beginning with comment 347109
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: So....don't Upgrade....
by Cymro on Wed 4th Feb 2009 14:39 UTC in reply to "So....don't Upgrade...."
Cymro
Member since:
2005-07-07

You purchased your machine with some version of OSX and some version of iLife and maybe purchased some version of iWork and some other apps were happy as a clam.

Did they suddenly stop working?


What a waste of words your post was. Being able to run future software without arbitrary limitations placed on you by the manufacturer is something that you simply expect when you buy a new computer.

Since you're a fan of metaphors, it's like a buying a tower machine and finding later that the expansion slots are arbitrarily set not to work with cards newer than 2008.

If you can't take a simple feature like this for granted, then it's a big argument against buying a Mac and people are rightly annoyed.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: So....don't Upgrade....
by Sabon on Wed 4th Feb 2009 16:41 in reply to "RE: So....don't Upgrade...."
Sabon Member since:
2005-07-06

"Since you're a fan of metaphors, it's like a buying a tower machine and finding later that the expansion slots are arbitrarily set not to work with cards newer than 2008."

Ok, do PowerPC adapter cards with in Intel Mac machines? No. Note it was you that brought that up.

Reply Parent Score: 3

StephenBeDoper Member since:
2005-07-06

Ok, do PowerPC adapter cards with in Intel Mac machines? No. Note it was you that brought that up.


See the word "arbitrarily" in the text you quoted? As in "based on or determined by individual preference or convenience rather than by necessity or the intrinsic nature of something."

That's the total opposite of the example you gave - you're talking about incompatibilities between different CPU architectures. That's an intrinsic limitation, not an arbitrary one.

Reply Parent Score: 2

apoclypse Member since:
2007-02-17

Funny you should mention that because has happened before. I didn't here to many complaint when ATI and Nvidia moved to PCI express over AGP and only gave consumers the lowest performing parts for AGP. Yes the limitation Apple puts are artificial but as it has been pointe out easily worked around, so hey don't support it out of the ox, big whoop, there are ways to get it to work if you REALLY need to learn how to play Proud Mary from John Fogerty.

Reply Parent Score: 2

StephenBeDoper Member since:
2005-07-06

Yes the limitation Apple puts are artificial but as it has been pointe out easily worked around


The existence of a work-around does nothing to change the fact that the limitation shouldn't have been present in the first place - and that people shouldn't need to resort to work-around solutions.

Reply Parent Score: 2