Linked by weildish on Sat 7th Feb 2009 10:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 347638
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Nope, dude. You mix Alpha with Beta. Alpha is feature complete but not bug free, while RC is 'seems ready to be released, but might contain show-stoppers when deployed and tested on a wider range of hardware' (hence the name release candidate). Beta is for squashing bugs.
Alpha isn't feature complete. Alpha is still in developement and is often not released to anyone outside of where it is developed (unless it is open source of course). Beta's are generally the first available feature complete versions of software meant for testing by a wider audience to discover bugs and inconsistencies.




Member since:
2005-07-12
Nope, dude. You mix Alpha with Beta. Alpha is feature complete but not bug free, while RC is 'seems ready to be released, but might contain show-stoppers when deployed and tested on a wider range of hardware' (hence the name release candidate). Beta is for squashing bugs.
But actually it doesn't matter if you call the thing beta or not. If Microsoft didn't get the touch features right, they won't be better in RC or the final release because they a) don't have enough time to change and test it and b) don't know jack about good user interfaces anyway. Of course they'll still claim their touch input is the best thing since bread and butter when they start selling Lose7 to the people that desperately try to get away from Vista ..
(BTW: the cheering of the fangirls here is really embarrassing - considering that Lose7 is a SP release users have to pay for ..)