Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Feb 2009 21:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 347769
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-02-08
Meh, if I wanted to use a desktop that looked like it belonged in 1998 I'd probably still choose Windows 98 over Linux. Linux has failed to deliver to the masses. It's complicated for the average user who can't even figure out how to install most programs. You want marker share, you'll have to learn to deal with those users.
Further, the Linux community is extremly disjointed unlike the Windows and Mac communities. There's much internal bickering about which distrobution is the best and there isn't even a shared experience with the desktop since there are so many flavors out there (Oh, you use KDE, I'm on Gnome).
All of that coupled with the average smug, insulting poster turns most people away from even thinking about trying Linux. Linux has made strides, but it's not there yet (for the desktop.. for the server it's a whole 'nuther story).