Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Feb 2009 18:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 348152
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm well aware that all operating systems have their advantages and disadvantages, but when Be arrived in 1996 (PowerPC) it could hardly be compared with NeXT which had been available since the late 80's (and which did multi user).
BeOS _was_ a good but not the best.
Dom.
BeOS _was_ a good but not the best.
Dom.
It depends how one defines "the best" I suppose.
I'm well aware that all operating systems have their advantages and disadvantages, but when Be arrived in 1996 (PowerPC) it could hardly be compared with NeXT which had been available since the late 80's (and which did multi user).
As operating systems go, they were quite different. BeOS was smaller and lighter/faster, while NeXT was more robust (especially in terms of RAD tools); BeOS stuck with the document-centric philosophies of the original MacOS, while NeXT focused more on application-centrism - etc, etc, etc.




Member since:
2009-02-10
I'm well aware that all operating systems have their advantages and disadvantages, but when Be arrived in 1996 (PowerPC) it could hardly be compared with NeXT which had been available since the late 80's (and which did multi user).
BeOS _was_ a good but not the best.
Dom.