Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Feb 2009 12:44 UTC
Mozilla & Gecko clones Recently it became known that the European Union is charging Microsoft with anticompetitive behaviour concerning its Internet Explorer web browser. The EU is considering forcing OEMs to offer consumers a choice of browser. Opera responded quite positively to these events, and now Mozilla has responded as well: they fully support the EU.
Thread beginning with comment 348197
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Reality check
by Moulinneuf on Wed 11th Feb 2009 00:19 UTC in reply to "RE: Reality check"
Moulinneuf
Member since:
2005-07-06

Problem is Microsoft don't have any valid patent , that don't have prior art or another older patent invention covering Microsoft *innovation*.

Scroll bar is IBM patented ...

Also similar technology don't mean we infringe on Microsoft patent either ...

It's innocent until proven guilty , if Microsoft as a problem , bring the point forward with details or sue , it's pathetic invalid insinuation don't impress anyone anymore.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: Reality check
by poundsmack on Wed 11th Feb 2009 00:28 in reply to "RE[2]: Reality check"
poundsmack Member since:
2005-07-13

Ah, your right. it was a co develop with MS but IBM did infact file teh patent.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5973663.html

I am not usually wrong, I tip my hat to you sir.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: Reality check
by lemur2 on Wed 11th Feb 2009 00:32 in reply to "RE[2]: Reality check"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

Problem is Microsoft don't have any valid patent , that don't have prior art or another older patent invention covering Microsoft *innovation*. Scroll bar is IBM patented ... Also similar technology don't mean we infringe on Microsoft patent either ... It's innocent until proven guilty , if Microsoft as a problem , bring the point forward with details or sue , it's pathetic invalid insinuation don't impress anyone anymore.


Potentially a bigger problem for Microsoft as a software-only company is that recent decisions in court case(s) have tended to support the position (similar to the official EU policy) that software alone is not patentable.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilski

Software is mathematics, after all, and mathematics is not patentable. Copyright, yes (you should do your own work) ... patents, no (you cannot own an abstract idea, only your particular expression of it in something substantial).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2