Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Wed 11th Feb 2009 09:51 UTC
Intel Intel demoed the world's first 32-nanometer processor today, showing it off in several test desktop and laptop configurations. There aren't any hard-set specifications or benchmarks just yet, but here's the scoop on the upcoming processors, according to Intel: The 45nm desktop and laptop processors (the Clarksfield and Lynnfield) with four cores will transitionally be replaced by dual core alternative 32nm processors (the Clarkdale and Arrandale) that also have an integrated graphics processor all with the same form factor as the 45nm chips. Two exciting side-notes: The first, Intel will be investing over $8 billion into the 32nm era (alright, so not immensely exciting, but definitely interesting, especially in this economy where money isn't shouldn't be thrown around without a mighty good cause). The second bit, according to one of Intel's charts, apparently there will be a 32nm high-end desktop processor (the Gulftown) that will have six cores. The good news? Parts of the platform will be going into production in 2009 for sure. The bad news? They said "parts." Be warned: that Core i7 you have your eye on will be a thing of the past come the newer and higher-end quad-core 32nm beauties.
Thread beginning with comment 348313
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by El_Exigente
by flanque on Wed 11th Feb 2009 20:44 UTC in reply to "Comment by El_Exigente"
Member since:

Oh I don't know.. maybe for those who are seriously thinking of buying an i7 (like me).. it's already practically obsolete.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by El_Exigente
by El_Exigente on Wed 11th Feb 2009 21:17 in reply to "RE: Comment by El_Exigente"
El_Exigente Member since:

That's not really an enlightening reply. Are i7's going to be "obsolete" in the sense that there are apps and OS'es that it will not run but which will run on the 32nm cpu's? Are the 32nm cpu's going to be run at several times the speed of i7's and yet cost but a fraction of the price? Really, the only thing that I can foresee, is that the retail cost of i7's might well decrease at some point reasonably soon after the 32nm's come market. But as to what "obsolete" means in this context, is not clear at all.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Comment by El_Exigente
by flanque on Wed 11th Feb 2009 21:25 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by El_Exigente"
flanque Member since:

I wasn't trying to enlighten you.

If you took that line of thought then my AMD Athlon64 3200+ wouldn't be considered obsolete, but at least to me it is.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Comment by El_Exigente
by weildish on Wed 11th Feb 2009 23:42 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by El_Exigente"
weildish Member since:

The reason I called it "bad news" was the very reason flangue mentioned. I'll expound a bit more. There are those of us who have been psyched about the new Core i7 processors. Having the newest, most powerful hardware is a plus for many people-- it's a sort of a pride thing, I guess. So when you've bought the most powerful thing on the market only to find out there's going to be something better soon, it's not so joyous. Also: if you've got your eye on the most powerful thing on the market but find out that something even better will be coming out in only a year or two, you're stuck between the choice of: Do I get what I want now, or do I wait a year or two and get the better piece of hardware? Or do I wait a year or two for the price of the current hardware to go down? So yes-- it's bad news in that sense, though I'm still rooting for new hardware to come out even though it makes my Phenom 9500, 2 GB DDR2, and ATI HD 2600XT worth less and less and look more and more like a compy a little kid would get from his dad after it's been used for ten years.

Reply Parent Score: 1