Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Feb 2009 12:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 348887
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Anyway, Im pleased they used GTK+, is light fast and well integrated with Linux. Thank you google.
This is the weirdest comment on GTK+ I've ever seen. GTK+ is anything but fast and light. Speed has always been the primary reason not to use GTK+ (and to use something faster, like Qt), as it is one of the slowest and heaviest GUI toolkits available. When people decide to use GTK+, it is always *despite* its performance, not because of it. People pick GTK+ because it is such a widespread toolkit, the de facto standard on Linux, and licensed under the LGPL (which, before Nokia announced that Qt 4.5 will be LGPLed, too, was the only real advantage for many people).




Member since:
2005-09-27
I think is more related to Nokia being the competence of Google (Android vs Qt movil).
Anyway, Im pleased they used GTK+, is light fast and well integrated with Linux. Thank you google.