Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Feb 2009 12:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 348927
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I can't follow you. Why would GNOME dump their default browser but KDE wouldn't?
Gnome treats its default browser as the redheaded stepchild. It's quite shameful. FF is effectively both KDE's and Gnome's default browser, in the real world. Which, as an advocate of Epiphany, annoys me no end. The Epiphany crew is working hard on dumping Gecko for WebKit. I am hoping that once they get loose from depending directly upon their most direct (and unsympathetic) competitor, and are using a superior rendering and javascript engine, Epiphany will finally come into its own and get the support it deserves.
Edited 2009-02-14 17:10 UTC
Firefox is not the default GNOME browser, it is the default web browser of Ubuntu, openSUSE etc. Just because many people don't understand the difference does not change the fact that the default GNOME browser is Epiphany. I know what you mean by the "real world", but still, Ubuntu is not GNOME. (Even if it means "GNOME is not the real world" then.) The fact that Ubuntu does not care about Epiphany does not mean that GNOME does not care about it.
Edited 2009-02-14 17:27 UTC





Member since:
2008-07-14
I can't follow you. Why would GNOME dump their default browser but KDE wouldn't?