Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Feb 2009 12:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 348971
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Why QT? Why not GTK+?
by vivainio on Sat 14th Feb 2009 20:23
in reply to "Why QT? Why not GTK+?"
Qt is not the better Toolkit. It is just another Toolkit. And for all the functions Qt brings besides QT GUI there are also solutions on GTK side.
There has got to be *some* reason companies were willing to pay thousands of dollars PER DEVELOPER for Qt licenses, when Gtk (& C++ bindings) and Wx were free, don't you think?
Still, I'm not arguing that google should have used Qt to develop this. If the coders want to do it Gtk, they can probably get best results with Gtk (especially when they know it inside out). And it's not like they will convert all of their existing code to GObject mess - just add parts that directly need to interface with toolkit, or use GTkmm.
RE[2]: Why QT? Why not GTK+?
by sbergman27 on Sat 14th Feb 2009 20:28
in reply to "RE: Why QT? Why not GTK+?"
RE[2]: Why QT? Why not GTK+?
by TLZ_ on Sun 15th Feb 2009 08:57
in reply to "RE: Why QT? Why not GTK+?"
Qt is not the better Toolkit. It is just another Toolkit. And for all the functions Qt brings besides QT GUI there are also solutions on GTK side.
It's not just the existance of a functionality that counts, it's how it's implemented and how it can be accessed and used, and how well it's documented. What you say can't be enough to base a decision on, you have to try coding for both to see why quite a number of people prefer QT/KDE. Well, you might not see it, or see it the other way around, so what ? Be happy there's the other(s) you can use.
RE[2]: Why QT? Why not GTK+?
by YEPHENAS on Sun 15th Feb 2009 12:20
in reply to "RE: Why QT? Why not GTK+?"
Show a Gtk counterpart to QGraphicsView. One that actually matches its functionality. Also, show me how to something like WolfenQt (google for it) using Gtk.
http://www.vimeo.com/374006





Member since:
2006-01-17
So? Show me the point.
Qt is not the better Toolkit. It is just another Toolkit. And for all the functions Qt brings besides QT GUI there are also solutions on GTK side.
Edited 2009-02-14 20:12 UTC