Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Feb 2009 12:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 348993
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Google is not one company
by darknexus on Sat 14th Feb 2009 20:59
in reply to "RE[5]: Google is not one company"
RE[6]: Google is not one company
by vivainio on Sat 14th Feb 2009 21:06
in reply to "RE[5]: Google is not one company"
Wow. I have one guy on one side hammering me about how QT is going LGPL and another guy on the other side hammering me about how we can't see the wonderful benefits of QT due to NDA agreements. Fantastic community. How can I join? Is there an NDA involved?
Of course you can hear about benefits of Qt - you just won't see what Nokia is up to as far as their products (phones) go immediately.
If anything, Qt development is moving to a more open model with LGPL license and other future changes to the development flow (acceptance of outside contributions without copyright assignment etc).
RE[7]: Google is not one company
by sbergman27 on Sat 14th Feb 2009 21:14
in reply to "RE[6]: Google is not one company"
If anything, Qt development is moving to a more open model with LGPL license
So, what about all those years we were told that QT was more Free because it was GPL instead of LGPL? I think the move is good. But isn't there a fair amount of crow to be eaten on the QT side? I'd like to observe the eating. Assuming that's not under NDA, too.





Member since:
2005-07-24
Wow. I have one guy on one side hammering me about how QT is going LGPL and another guy on the other side hammering me about how we can't see the wonderful benefits of QT due to NDA agreements. Fantastic community. How can I join? Is there an NDA involved?
Edited 2009-02-14 20:54 UTC