Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Sep 2005 19:40 UTC, submitted by _LH_
Thread beginning with comment 34926
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
Someone from the Mono camp please comment on the story mentioned above:
http://news.com.com/2100-1001-984052.html
I would really like to hear about how there is nothing to worry about and that Mono is built on a solid legal basis and that those using it will *never* have to pay a dime to M$.
If the Linux croud are stupid enough to make mono the preferred way of building desktop apps, then I hope Linux dies a slow, painful death when M$ comes knocking at their door. This will be an example to anyone in the OSS community that thinks it is ok to follow M$'s lead.
Not only that, but OSS Java is getting close...classpath is somewhere around 93% complete for JDK 1.4:
http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk14-classpath.html
I suspect in the next year or so we'll see a fairly complete implementation of OSS Java suitable for mainstream use.