Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Feb 2009 14:07 UTC
Editorial Late last week we ran a story on how the Google Chrome team had decided to use Gtk+ as the graphical toolkit for the Linux version of the Chrome web browser. It was a story that caused some serious debate on a variety of aspects, but in this short editorial, I want to focus on one aspect that came forward: the longing for consistency. Several people in the thread stated they were happy with Google's choice for purely selfish reasons: they use only Gtk+ applications on their GNOME desktops. Several people chimed in to say that Qt integrates nicely in a Gtk+ environment. While that may be true from a graphical point of view, that really isn't my problem with mixing toolkits. The issue goes a lot deeper than that.
E-mail Print r 2   · Read More · 93 Comment(s)
Thread beginning with comment 349277
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: OMG
by xnoreq on Mon 16th Feb 2009 15:52 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: OMG"
Member since:

Oh come on, he does have a point... based on their bizarre interface in Windows, Google Chrome probably isn't going to feel right in KDE *or* Gnome, so it's hardly worth anyone getting up in arms about their choice of toolkit.

That's exactly what I meant. It will probably be more inconsistent with other Gtk apps than Qt <-> Gtk apps!
So even if you use the super ability to stick to one toolkit only it won't give you a consistent desktop.

Reply Parent Score: 3