Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Feb 2009 17:34 UTC
Linux The ArchLinux Release Engineering Team announced the official release of the 2009.02 ISO after a long period of intense development. This distribution is among the first to officially support the new Ext4 filesystem. I've always noticed that Arch seems to be quite popular among OSNews readers, and I'm interested to know from our Arch users: why? What makes Arch such a good Linux distribution?
Thread beginning with comment 349518
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Good or not â¦
by detto on Tue 17th Feb 2009 18:01 UTC
Member since:

… it's your taste that defines the distro you chose.

Arch is for me the best because I can do a base install with it (even shrink that down a bit more after first reboot) and then install just what I want. And that in a very fast and simple way thanks to the pkg manager pacman.

Sure, you have to modify some config files, but to ~90% it's all about the rc.conf which is very well documented and therefore easy to modify. IIRC I had to add hal, fam and alsa to the modules array so they get loaded at boot. That pretty much sums it up for configuration that I had to do.

But the real beauty is makepkg and ABS imo.
Compared to other distros it's sooo easy to write a PKGBUILD file and therefore many many users are contributing such PKGUILDS via the AUR. There are already tools (yaourt for example) that let you automatically fetch those PKGBUILDS from the AUR, make a pkg from it and install it.
Combining the official binary repositories from Arch and the PKGBUILDs from AUR is probably one of the biggest package libraries in all distros.

An example of the awesomness of PKGBUILDs: If you don't need flac support in your mkvtoolnix then quickly grab the PKGBUILD, delete the --enable-flac line and the 'flac' dependency and issue a makepkg command to build it. That's all.

To sum it up (probably reads familiar to many other conclusions about Arch Linux): you can mold it into any possible way and that in a simple way. Easy != simple imo, but as soon as you know the basics about Arch you won't leave it anytime soon.

Reply Score: 4

RE: Good or not �
by bnolsen on Wed 18th Feb 2009 17:00 in reply to "Good or not â¦"
bnolsen Member since:

Arch linux rocks because it does a good job of following the KISS principle. I appreciate what choices they made for a linux distro, it's a very good balance between customizability and ease of use.

I've run gentoo for 5+ years now and it's just plain crushing itself with complexity. Too many use flags, too many config files, openrc is a pain, consistency starting to fall apart, etc.

rc.conf rocks. Just list what services start, even indicate which services should start in the background.

I haven't messed with PKGBUILDS myself. I have arch running on my acer aspire one and on a 6yro laptop.

Reply Parent Score: 2