Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 15th Feb 2009 14:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 349539
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Congratulations are in order
by sbergman27 on Tue 17th Feb 2009 19:25
in reply to "RE[5]: Congratulations are in order"
Vista certainly fulfills in the same way
Back when the '486/66 machines were top of the line, I remember reading a PC Magazine review which commented that there was finally a machine, albeit an expensive one, that could run Windows 3.1 at a reasonable speed. So yes, I guess you could say that Vista fulfills in the same way...
Edited 2009-02-17 19:25 UTC
RE[7]: Congratulations are in order
by rockwell on Tue 17th Feb 2009 22:03
in reply to "RE[6]: Congratulations are in order"





Member since:
2005-09-13
Obiviously, because Windows 3.1 isn't in use much anymore.
Vista certainly fulfills in the same way -- for me and millions of others.