Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Feb 2009 14:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 349542
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: We're Stuck With It
by sbergman27 on Tue 17th Feb 2009 19:17
in reply to "RE[9]: We're Stuck With It"




Member since:
2006-09-12
Don't beat yourself up. For commercial development, up to just a couple months ago, there was a per seat charge for QT. QT has only very recently been released as LGPL. The fee was pretty steep as well, amounting to about $1500 per seat per platform. They offer 3 platforms, Windows, OS X, and Unix.
Many thanks. I understand now that this is a per-developer seat, which is sort of in the same price range as other dev toolsets. Steep, but probably reasonable. My previous understanding (prior correction) was that it was more like a royalty per customer.
Even so though, convincing a board of directors that we need to rig 20 developers at $1500 pers seat per platform
(or 1500*3 platforms*20 = $90 000),
they would go: "Are you nuts? how do you plan to recover those costs by not charging for your software? do you really need to target Max & Linux? why not just target WIN32 like you have for the past 15 years?"
I am very glad to hear QT has gone LGPL.