Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Feb 2009 22:33 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 349665
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No, I'm pretty sure it is an "OS". Its kernel might be Darwin, but the rest of the userland is its own beast.
I've noticed that the definition of "Operating System" has changed over the years. Back when I was in college, in the 1980s, the definition of OS that we used was what we would now call a kernel. Core libraries were considered kind of "in the middle". Nowadays, it seems like the web browser and standard text editor count.
Edited 2009-02-18 18:11 UTC





Member since:
2008-02-10
First of all there is no OS called Mac OS X. It's just a brand/distripution name for Darwin BSD which is fork of Next Step which in turn was 386-BSD fork.
"iPhone OS" uses Darwin BSD with UI built on top of set of APIs which can be found from the full distribution of "Mac OS X".
BSD's are easy to get embed in small devices and are widely used in consumer electronics. So I'd say it's bit unfair to say that Windows CE is "true" embed os and Darwin BSD isn't. Besides how do you define "true embed os"???