Linked by Kroc Camen on Tue 24th Feb 2009 14:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 350456
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Safari still a memory pig? No crash protection?
by someone on Wed 25th Feb 2009 02:44
in reply to "Safari still a memory pig? No crash protection?"
Another reason is that Safari has lacked really basic things like session-save and crash protection. To get that, you have to buy Saft, which becomes a bit of a pain every time Safari gets updated. Did they fix that yet?
Have you tried History/Reopen All Windows from Last Session (available since Safari 3)?
RE[2]: Safari still a memory pig? No crash protection?
by thewolf on Wed 25th Feb 2009 10:04
in reply to "RE: Safari still a memory pig? No crash protection?"






Member since:
2006-03-02
One reason I switched from Safari to Firefox, despite the fact that I miss some of the usability features is that Safari was a huge memory pig. It would use on the order of 3x the memory of Firefox for the same thing, and yes, I am taking into consideration the fact that Firefox will return pages to the OS while Safari will not. I bet they haven't done a damn thing about memory usage.
Another reason is that Safari has lacked really basic things like session-save and crash protection. To get that, you have to buy Saft, which becomes a bit of a pain every time Safari gets updated. Did they fix that yet?