Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Feb 2009 10:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 350598
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-11
In my opinion this is because they had to fight linux for a whole segment: Netbooks.
They had to keep Windows XP in the running and probably had to do a lot of persuasion to prevent the loss of that whole segment to linux.. I even think this is the reason why they ditch Vista so soon and bring in Windows 7. So yes linux is a much greater threath a the moment because, untill Windows 7 they won't have a answer for new hardware requiring a lean flexible OS.
Edited 2009-02-25 11:34 UTC