Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 27th Feb 2009 11:53 UTC, submitted by B12 Simon
Thread beginning with comment 350971
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Xfce is a horrible name to catch.
by merkoth on Fri 27th Feb 2009 19:04
in reply to "Xfce is a horrible name to catch."
RE[2]: Xfce is a horrible name to catch.
by Michael on Fri 27th Feb 2009 22:03
in reply to "RE: Xfce is a horrible name to catch."
RE[2]: Xfce is a horrible name to catch.
by prickett on Sat 28th Feb 2009 02:11
in reply to "RE: Xfce is a horrible name to catch."
RE: Xfce is a horrible name to catch.
by dvzt on Sun 1st Mar 2009 02:08
in reply to "Xfce is a horrible name to catch."




Member since:
2007-06-02
One of the things that is needed for Xfce to become number one is a name change. Seriously. KDE & GNOME are very catchy, but Xfce... did you ever try to spell this? What about spelling in a foreign language? Even more complicated? I wished I knew how to spell in french.
In all seriousness, If I were Olivier, I would change this name to something like Nebbia, Andromeda, XF², Modex, Orion... but eks-éf-see-ee is damn hard to hear, swallow, or speak.
I completely understand the *nix name and acronyms mania, but something like fwmn, xfce, lpqs, qxnp... is hardly human. Microsoft did its homework and chose the stupidiest name to name their OS/Desktop: Windows.
For example... You are not familiar to Linux and not even familiar with desktops. Suppose I present you the new desktop environment:
wxfzk
See what I mean?