To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Regarding 1) though...they do have few ideas that might prove useful, for example their battery tech which is supposedly marginally worse (energy density wise) than current Li-Ion but much safer. Also, they use a novel way to put to sleep even gfx controller when the only thing that's displayed is a static image (though that might fall under 3)...)
And on a more general note...I believe performance comparable to the XO-1 might be enough, if the machine has thouroughly thought out software on it (if you think about it...upcoming ARM netbooks aren't really that much faster than the XO probably, gaining most from video decoding hardware). BTW, that's why I don't understand software side of OLPC...why they didn't create something based on Gnustep & Webkit (it should fly in comparison to their Python, GTK & Gecko stack...), for example?
Most people around me look only at the price when buying a laptop anyway...




Member since:
2009-02-11
"Negroponte says there are three areas where OLPC technology can help improve netbooks. Low power computing (as in, lower than 2W), the ability to be repaired easily (ruggedness), as well as the screen technology to allow for reading in bright sunlight."
Well, let's see...
(1) Low power computing: it's important for users to have an excellent battery life but they also want horsepower. Atom is going dual-core, VIA C7-M is being seen as dead-slow, people waits for the nVidia ION, and so on.
Even if they don't really need more power, if they can have more power they'll go for it. Like forever in the computer market...
And of course, while people wants an excellent battery life, they are not lost in a country with no easy-to-find power outlet. Basically you have one at the very least at home... Low power computing is not vital, it's just a good thing.
Users needing the most battery life will certainly opt for additional batteries or for extended capacity batteries instead of choosing a lower power computing device.
(2) Ruggedness and easilly repaired: yeah users would love that but do you really expect for OEM to provide it?
They'd rather sell products that breaks in two years tops so you have all the best reasons to buy another product.
(3) Reading in bright sunlight: here is the only thing that could actually be used in actual products! A lot of people complains about it, moaning "hell why can't I get the OLPC display in my netbook!!!"
But the marketing goes the other way. Better selling a coloured and bright display than a B&W sunlight readable. That's much more appealling...
But who knows? We'll see what comes out of it.
Edited 2009-03-02 17:05 UTC