Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 1st Mar 2009 17:26 UTC, submitted by kaiwai
Hardware, Embedded Systems Long-time OSNews reader Kaiwai has written down his experiences with his Acer Aspire One, Linux, and Windows. He concludes: "After a hectic few weeks trying to get Linux to work, I am back to square one again - a netbook running Windows XP SP3 as it was provided by Acer when I purchased it. I gave three different distributions a chance to prove themselves. I expected all three distributions to wipe the floor with Windows XP - after all, these are the latest and greatest distributions the Linux world have to offer. There has been at least 7 years since the release of Windows XP for Linux to catch up to Windows XP and from my experience with Linux on this said device - it has failed to step up to the plate when it was needed."
Thread beginning with comment 351375
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Clueless
by kaiwai on Tue 3rd Mar 2009 00:09 UTC in reply to "Clueless"
Member since:

While I am a pretty strong advocate of open source software in many uses and the share and share alike philosophy of the GPL (it works basically), it's always astonishing to me how clueless people are as to how far off we really are at getting a fully integrated open source destop system to compete with Windows.

All Kaiwai was pointing out is that there is only so much of the "Oh, just read this guide, and oh, just point to these repositories" advice you can take before it simply becomes counterproductive. Why the hell is this article not relevant, and why should it not be posted? Are we supposed to say nothing about desktop Linux and say nothing against demi-Gods like Ubuntu?

I think we all need to get a firm grip and admit where we are a long way short in the open source, free desktop world.

The stupid part of the debate is when people label me an idiot - ignoring the fact that I have run Linux for 9 years. I know it back to front, up and down, left to right BUT I clearly stated in the article that I no longer give a toss about tinkering, I just want the thing to work out of the box with minimum fuss and bother.

Then again, how many people here actually read the comments, read the article and take time to absorb what people say? there is an idiot on my blog called Howard who couldn't even be bothered reading the previous posts because if he had he wouldn't have made such a clusterf*ck of a comment claiming I was using a tweaked OEM installation when I clearly stated I was comparing Linux to an OEM installation of Windows XP I did from a CD.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Clueless
by m4xr8d on Tue 3rd Mar 2009 03:25 in reply to "RE: Clueless"
m4xr8d Member since:

Maybe you should re-read your very own blog. You never,I'll repeat NEVER stated I was comparing Linux to an OEM installation of Windows XP I did from a CD.

Idiots can be idiots for as long as they live. Regardless of how ever long they/you might have tried to use Linux.

You are an idiot.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[3]: Clueless
by segedunum on Tue 3rd Mar 2009 15:44 in reply to "RE[2]: Clueless"
segedunum Member since:

You never,I'll repeat NEVER stated I was comparing Linux to an OEM installation of Windows XP I did from a CD.

Except he.............wasn't. Maybe if a Linux distribution had what I described above, a sane way of developing and installing software, then we might get an OEM distribution CD for a system.

You didn't read the article and haven't read any of the comments here.

Reply Parent Score: 2