To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So I'm gonna get a bit off topic, but basically, this post is about how Apple is one of the last good workstation producers I could find. If I'm wrong in any of this, happy to hear corrections.
I do not like Apple. I do not particularly like OS X. However, after going through several hours of web surfing to find decent workstations, I essentially came up with 2 viable offerings: HP and Apple. In many ways, the Apple seemed to be better and in some comparable configurations, even cheaper.
I was saddened to see that Sun no longer makes the Ultra 40 line of their x64 systems; their current offering is moderate at best - definitely not a top end workstation. Furthermore, there are *no* more alternative architectures. Sun stopped with SPARC about a year ago and IBM just stopped with PPC intellistations, which ironically, I believe was the last workstation they were producing (no more at all now!). Itanium was practically old news before it started, but, at least you can download nvidia drivers from 2005... And yes, to be considered a workstation, I require: 3d options (not necessarily bleeding edge, but good), good memory capabilities (16GB+), large storage capacity (the Sun U40 supports up to 8 internal hard drives), and an excellent case design. I really believe the first option, 3d hardware acc, is the killer for alternative architectures.
Funny Apple is getting all defensive about this, when all they really needed to do to reduce the number of clones was stick with PPC and uh, be different ... but here I'm stating the obvious.
It seems like the workstation really is dying, which is too bad. Guess I'll hop on the android bandwagon and have fun with mobile devices and remote services, no time at the moment for hacking 3d drivers (which I have 0 experience with) to work with high quality SPARC or POWER servers. I hate building my own comps by now, mainly, not having the warranty.
When it comes to computers, most people are.
As harsh as it sounds, it's not meant as an insult to peoples intellegence though. It's just most people don't need (or even want) to know about which hardware is better than which other hardware or what OS to run.
Most people are happy to just rely on the advice of others on such matters.
Just like, I don't need to know how repare a car, that's what engineers are there for. I just need to know the basics (oil change etc).




Member since:
2006-06-02
Just last week, on my local Macintosh User Group forum, one of the most knowledgeable about Apple suggested that perhaps the Hackintosh method was the way to go, in a debate about the relative expensiveness of newly launched Apple hardware.
You can argue the toss about the latter point but people generally ain't dumb, especially in these straightened times: over time the Hackintosh will be an increasingly doable, feasible and attractive option, as the community around it and the userbase expand.
When Jobs goes, for whatever reason, and respect to the man in his current condition, there will not be a strategy to deal with this. Not only because he won't be at the helm, flying his particular colours but also because in my view Apple will not be in the personal computer market any longer, and will have no interest in it. It will have become a personal device manufacturer, and OS X will not be available in retail form in its current guise in, I'll be radical, 5 years from now.
So, Apple computer fans and Hackintosh proponents alike - make hay while the sun shines, because the sun will go down on the Apple personal computer business model within half a decade.