Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 352251
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by lurch_mojoff
by Soulbender on Mon 9th Mar 2009 09:16
in reply to "Comment by lurch_mojoff"
Why would a sticker on the box make you consider it an "upgrade" version, but a clause in the EULA won't?
Because the sticker is clearly visible prior to purchase while the EULA is not. Therefore, the customer is fully aware of the limitations and the "upgrade" limitation is not a post-sale restriction.
RE[2]: Comment by lurch_mojoff
by lurch_mojoff on Mon 9th Mar 2009 11:22
in reply to "RE: Comment by lurch_mojoff"
That's a fair point, but the presence of something "clearly visible prior to purchase" is not what makes an upgrade version and upgrade version. Rather, it's the respective clause in the respective EULA. The sticker is just what helps buyers distinguish between the different versions of the product on the shelf.
RE[2]: Comment by lurch_mojoff
by rhavyn on Mon 9th Mar 2009 16:41
in reply to "RE: Comment by lurch_mojoff"
"Why would a sticker on the box make you consider it an "upgrade" version, but a clause in the EULA won't?
Because the sticker is clearly visible prior to purchase while the EULA is not. Therefore, the customer is fully aware of the limitations and the "upgrade" limitation is not a post-sale restriction. "
You realize that the outside of the box says you need an Apple Macintosh computer to install OS X, right? If labeling on the outside of the box is the hurdle to convince you Psystar is in the wrong, Apple already met it.
RE: Comment by lurch_mojoff
by sagum on Mon 9th Mar 2009 15:54
in reply to "Comment by lurch_mojoff"
I have a question here.
"...Or it might be labelled as upgrade only.
"...Or it might be labelled as upgrade only.
Why would a sticker on the box make you consider it an "upgrade" version, but a clause in the EULA won't? What is the difference? What are the legal, or at least moral, grounds on which that makes sense? "
Generally, like the article said, an 'Upgrade' version checks for previous installations of the software.
If you've got software already installed, then you've already agreed to an ELUA, and that is what the article is trying to simplify the fact of.





Member since:
2007-05-12
I have a question here.
Why would a sticker on the box make you consider it an "upgrade" version, but a clause in the EULA won't? What is the difference? What are the legal, or at least moral, grounds on which that makes sense?