Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Thread beginning with comment 352257
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Would this be legal...?
by jal_ on Mon 9th Mar 2009 10:00 UTC
jal_
Member since:
2006-11-02

I find especially the following part of the US law interesting:

(1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner


It seems that the 'adaptation' part refers to changing the software. And if so, it would seem I am allowed to change the software in such a way that it does not display the EULA to me, as this can be seen as "an essential step in the utilization" (since with the EULA, I cannot install it on such a machine, but without it I can). Which would circumventing the EULA be legal.


JAL

Reply Score: 1