Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 352263
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: The right question
by Soulbender on Mon 9th Mar 2009 11:57
in reply to "RE: The right question"
RE[3]: The right question
by lurch_mojoff on Mon 9th Mar 2009 12:55
in reply to "RE[2]: The right question"
No, thus it is not a valid contract until I actually install and read the EULA, if even ten.
The EULA is not a contract, per se. It is a document describing the terms under which you are given the license you've purchased. The license always comes with these terms (well unless a court deems some of them illegal). In most jurisdictions (for example, as it seems according to Thom, in the Netherlands) the licenser needs to make the terms generally available and doesn't have to get your agreement prior to purchase. If the law where you live differs then you may have a point. In most places it doesn't though.





Member since:
2007-05-12
It's not about breach of copyright, it's about breach of the terms of the license you purchased form Apple. And, yes, Apple can ask a court of law to force you to stop using their software because you breached the license terms. They won't, because it will cost them significantly less to just let you do whatever the hell you want with the software, but technically they absolutely can get you to court over that.