Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Thread beginning with comment 352268
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by lurch_mojoff
by Soulbender on Mon 9th Mar 2009 12:03 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by lurch_mojoff"
Soulbender
Member since:
2005-08-18

Again, this is the part where many of you make the wrong assumptions.


No we're not, we're just not talking about Dutch law. We're talking about actually sane countries where you cant force customers to abide by arbitrary contracts clauses AFTER the purchase has already taken place.

It is exactly like, for instance, the rules in a supermarket or mall.


Except that supermarket and malls do not dictate what you can do with a product AFTER purchase. Man, Dutch law must be seriously screwed up or you talked to the wrong people.

Reply Parent Score: 3