Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Thread beginning with comment 352303
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
kaelodest
Member since:
2006-02-12

Yup I was a windy there. I agree Psystar is not even remotely OSS, I suspect that they are playing the the whole F/OSS sentiment with a fist in a velvet glove. There is very little case to be made for SW transfer after sale. My view (as a developer) is similar to Wil Shipley - of delicious monster. As a matter of fact I prefer F/OSS in the workplace. I Like not having to reinvent the wheel and having the option to learn from someone else's well written code. That is OUR dog in this fight. We can learn and give back - it is a positive feedback loop. Much SW for the Mac is hella overpriced (like photoshop and most of the music apps) and that is a negative feedback. It adds the price of another base model Mac to the cost of a workstation.

If However I was going to sell a copy of SW then I sort of have to give the disk serial number and box. Why would I sell an App or an OS if I planned on still using it?

I disagree that the the magic of Apple is select HW and SW integration the proof of that lies in the ease that Apple has switching the code base from Motorola 68K (in Many Macs even in 1995) to Motorola PPC 1994-2005 and Intel chips -- That seems like a large investment in well written code. Those are some hard dues to pay. That r&d is why I do not like why psystar is playing at.

Reply Parent Score: 1