Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Thread beginning with comment 352304
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

You realize that the outside of the box says you need an Apple Macintosh computer to install OS X, right? If labeling on the outside of the box is the hurdle to convince you Psystar is in the wrong, Apple already met it.


Yes, and that game I bought for my PC tells me I need Windows in order to play the game. Does that mean I'm not allowed to install it under WINE?

What you are referring to are the system requirements. They have absolutely NOTHING to do with the EULA.

Reply Parent Score: 2

lurch_mojoff Member since:
2007-05-12

The outside of the box also says, and I quote:

Important: Use of this product is subject to acceptance of the software license agreement(s) included in this product; also viewable at www.apple.com/go/swlicenses

How about that.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

I know, so in The Netherlands, the Apple probably has a leg to stand on, since the requirements for "terms of use" are met (terms are included, printable, and mentioned). However, I still don't think a Dutch judge will side with Apple in The Netherlands.

Reply Parent Score: 1