Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 352361
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
You brought in Psystar - not me. "
Last time I checked, this entire article is about Psystar. Again, please don't be disingenuous.
Psystar never came into our argument, so I have no idea why you're bringing it in now - apart from the obvious fact of course that you want to shift the attention away from an argument you were losing, but I'll forgive you for that.
As I said in my previous post, which you did not respond to (which seems to be par for the course for you, why not try responding to the actual arguments instead of going off into random interludes):
"I'm sorry, how does that prove that there is something wrong with tying your products? As a matter of fact, it seems your example proves what I'm saying. Sony went out of their way to prevent anyone from being able to play Playstation games on non Sony hardware. Was Sony in some way sanctioned for that behavior? No? Maybe because tying products isn't inherantly illegal? "
The result of the lawsuit was that bleem could do something Sony didn't want them to do, not that Sony did anything wrong.