Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Mar 2009 20:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 352390
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Windows 7 isn't that resource intensive to begin with. I've ran the beta on a single core pentium 4 with 768mb of ram with no problems. So if Windows 7 can perform acceptably on that machine then there is no reason to have a specific netbook edition. Netbooks are only going to get faster as technology gets better. The next round of netbooks with dual core atom processors and 2 gigs of memory should have no problem running a full version of windows 7. The only thing Microsoft could add would be netbook specific optimizations and gui tweaks to compensate for the small screen size.
What price? If there is only one version of Windows 7, presumably (to be legal) it would be the same price everywhere. Otherwise we are looking at a case of dumping the product on one market in order to kill competition, aren't we?
So would it be a netbook-compatible price (about $5 to OEMs), or instead would it be a "MS can make a profit" price?
Edited 2009-03-10 04:50 UTC






Member since:
2008-06-29
Windows 7 isn't that resource intensive to begin with. I've ran the beta on a single core pentium 4 with 768mb of ram with no problems. So if Windows 7 can perform acceptably on that machine then there is no reason to have a specific netbook edition. Netbooks are only going to get faster as technology gets better. The next round of netbooks with dual core atom processors and 2 gigs of memory should have no problem running a full version of windows 7. The only thing Microsoft could add would be netbook specific optimizations and gui tweaks to compensate for the small screen size.