Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Thread beginning with comment 352405
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Uhm...
by MobyTurbo on Tue 10th Mar 2009 07:04 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Uhm..."
MobyTurbo
Member since:
2005-07-08

Although I'm on Apple's side on this issue, your facts are wrong: Palm OS was not only on many devices, legally, Palm spun it off into a separate company and that company sold it to other Palm OS device makers.

Remember the Sony Clie, the Handspring Visor, and numerous other PDAs that used the Palm OS? (You don't? That's because you're a whippersnapper. ;-) ) The only reason why you only see Palm making them now is because the PDA market dried up, making everyone leave except Palm in the Palm OS PDA market, and nobody else was interested in making phones with it. (Though the first PalmOS phones were also not made by Palm, but a small company that no longer makes such phones to my knowledge.)

Reply Parent Score: 1