Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Thread beginning with comment 352412
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Uhm...
by alcibiades on Tue 10th Mar 2009 07:46 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Uhm..."
alcibiades
Member since:
2005-10-12

When you buy a software product, do you automatically receive the right to use it as you see fit? I don't think copyright law provides for this at all - especially where 'usage' involves making one or more copies, whether in system RAM or on disk.


Yes, you do automatically get such a right. Look at the section of the US Copyright law quoted in the article and by one other poster here. It says:

it is not an infringement [of copyright] for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided:

(1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner


Copyright law generally is implemented to accord with an international convention, so this is probably true in most jurisdictions.

Reply Parent Score: 2