Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 352492
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Whose boat is it?
by Bobthearch on Tue 10th Mar 2009 17:16
in reply to "RE[4]: Whose boat is it?"
RE[5]: Whose boat is it?
by alcibiades on Tue 10th Mar 2009 18:49
in reply to "RE[4]: Whose boat is it?"
RE[6]: Whose boat is it?
by gcbirzan on Tue 10th Mar 2009 19:04
in reply to "RE[5]: Whose boat is it?"
What you are missing is that Psystar is installing retail copies of OSX as an agent of the end customer.
Should I be allowed to install Windows XP for someone without permission from MS?
Same thing.
Should I be allowed to install Windows XP for someone without permission from MS?
Same thing.
What you're missing is what the restriction is. The only purpose of that is to take choice away from its customers, choice over something totally unrelated. Somebody put it quite nicely, saying that it would be akin to book publishers saying you're only allowed to read their books with their prescription glasses.
Not allowing customers to make a choice is something that most legal systems frawn upon.
RE[6]: Whose boat is it?
by GCrain on Tue 10th Mar 2009 20:40
in reply to "RE[5]: Whose boat is it?"
What you are missing is that Psystar is installing retail copies of OSX as an agent of the end customer. Should I be allowed to install Windows XP for someone without permission from MS? Same thing.
No, they are *including* a retail copy. They are installing a hacked version of their own, trying to side step the legality by saying that a license was purchased.
Should it be legal for me to buy Windows Home Basic hack it to Ultimate (on the same install media), remove Validation and install it as an 'agent' for someone else and profit from it? If Psystar wins, then it seems that it would be okay too.
Should it be legal to sell hacked software if the original was purchased and included (insert some copyright court case here)?





Member since:
2005-07-11
Where lies the Apple - Psystar liability? They are using MacOS, which is branded by Apple. You supposedly bought a retail version of MacOS-there is some inherent liability back to Apple. If MacOS installed on Psystar computers inflicts damage in some way, it WILL be associated with Apple. Apple has a right to protect themselves. Psystar is an opportunistic little company with no money. Even if they are 100% liable, they would not be the target.