Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Thread beginning with comment 352497
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

Psystar is only in this for the short haul and to make a quick buck off of Apple.


Yeah, that's probably why they went into a complicated lawsuit with multiple high-profile lawyers against one of the richest companies in the world.

Yeah, they're really in for the short haul and quick buck. Give me a break.

Reply Parent Score: 1

GCrain Member since:
2005-07-11

"Psystar is only in this for the short haul and to make a quick buck off of Apple.
Yeah, that's probably why they went into a complicated lawsuit with multiple high-profile lawyers against one of the richest companies in the world. Yeah, they're really in for the short haul and quick buck. Give me a break. "

So you think Psystar is paying legal fees upfront ?? Give ME a break....

Do you think a team of expert lawyers see Psystar's business model of shitty hackintoshes as a prosperus plan? They want Apple to settle out of court. Psystars lawyers know that this would be cheaper for Apple. Then they get their cut.

Reply Parent Score: 1

Bobthearch Member since:
2006-01-27

It was APPLE that started the predatory heavy-handed legal proceedings, not Psystar.

Reply Parent Score: 2