Linked by snydeq on Wed 11th Mar 2009 10:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 352626
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
True. And the SP2 story itself is also not the most glorious one. Microsoft watched hell breaking loose for years before they even announced it. And how long did the whole world actually wait for them to deliver from that one? Afaik it was at least one year.
One year of people begging for MS' mercy. It was hilarious if not frightening to see this global dependency come visible.





Member since:
2006-02-05
Read that far. Windows XP SP1 was about SATA and USB2, but it would still get pwnd within minutes of being connected to the internet, although by then most of the stability and performance issues had been addressed. SP2 was about security and came 2 years later.
Guess I can't complain that much, it is page 2. I just find it irritating when tech journalists dont even have the enthusiast level of knowledge about what they are writing.
Edited 2009-03-11 12:07 UTC