Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Thu 12th Mar 2009 05:32 UTC, submitted by caffeine deprived
Thread beginning with comment 352815
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Windows on ARM? WHY?
by dvhh on Tue 17th Mar 2009 07:05
in reply to "RE[5]: Windows on ARM? WHY?"
yes that's why it's a hell to try to install .net v1 on nt4 and, difficult to install .net v3.5 on windows 2000(sic).
I also think that people need to target alternate runtime ( Mono or even dotGNU ). But lastest feature always look nice in the eyes of a developper.
Maybe we should stick to java
.






Member since:
2006-08-18
A large portion of .NET applications use P/Invokes to access processor-specific native Windows DLLs. This pretty much kills the prospect of cross-CPU compatibility.
It might be possible to develop managed applications with Mono, since the runtime exists for other CPU architectures--including ARM?
But how many popular commercial .NET applications are 100% managed (no access to unmanaged libraries) and target or even support the Mono runtime?
Edited 2009-03-12 15:40 UTC