Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Mar 2009 23:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 353017
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: payment or donation
by nick_vaj on Fri 13th Mar 2009 10:00
in reply to "RE[5]: payment or donation"
RE[7]: payment or donation
by yahya on Fri 13th Mar 2009 10:52
in reply to "RE[6]: payment or donation"
"
That was only after Korz had announced that he ceases ZETA development and mulled about open-sourcing it.
That was only after Korz had announced that he ceases ZETA development and mulled about open-sourcing it.
As usual, you are wrong. "
Nope, I am not. Read the link you have posted. It was the announcement that ZETA development would cease and Korz' public deliberations about open-sourcing it, which actually prompted the reaction by ACCESS, Inc. As long as development was still ongoing, they never made any public statement about it.
If you compare the ZETA and SkyOS cases, you obviously need an entry in my kill-file. LOL.
Your business. Please go ahead.
Edited 2009-03-13 10:55 UTC





Member since:
2007-03-29
But that's not relevant. ZETA was a pirated copy [1] of BeOS so they had no choice. SkyOS have no such issues.
Nick.
[1] http://www.bitsofnews.com/content/view/5498/44/ "
That was only after Korz had announced that he ceases ZETA development and mulled about open-sourcing it.
Up to that point, the lack of transparency is what makes both businesses similar. Apart from that both were closed-source and did not collect donations but sold a product, part of which was a promise for future improvement, which both failed to deliver.
Again, you cannot have customers and then complain that they start behaving like customers...